Thursday, June 27, 2024
- Advertisment -
HomeNewsSupreme Court Refuses Home Depot’s Appeal of $2.7 Billion Settlement

Supreme Court Refuses Home Depot’s Appeal of $2.7 Billion Settlement

- Top Ad -

Home Depot has lost its ten-year-long battle with Blue Cross Blue Shield. 

Home Depot Logo
Source: Pinterest

According to a verdict by the Supreme Court of the United States, Home Depot was officially denied its appeal of a $2.7 billion antitrust settlement against Blue Cross Blue Shield. 

The Verdict 

The Supreme Court released a verdict on the Home Depot vs Blue Cross Blue Shield case on June 24th, 2024. Blue Cross Blue Shield is an insurance company that provides services to more than 115 million Americans, making it one one of the biggest insurance companies in the country.

- Inline 1-
Blue Cross Blue Shield Logo
Source: Pinterest

Home Depot is also one of the biggest American multinational retail corporations that provide appliances, tools, services and many more to people who require these services.

Serious Legal Claims 

Without a doubt, this court verdict did not go how the lawyers at Home Depot wanted it to. In addition, the lawyers complained that the settlement would have negative consequences for the company, as it would be very hard for them to sue other brands for antitrust violations in the future. 

Antitrust Law
Source: Pinterest

However, Blue Cross Blue Shield has continued to deny all the allegations made by Home Depot since the beginning of the trial. 

A Statement by the Spokesperson

After winning the case, a Blue Cross Blue Shield spokesman gave a statement to Newsweek shortly after. The statement read that the insurance company was very pleased with the decision by the Supreme Court. 

- Inline 2-
Home Depot Outlet
Source: Pinterest

They also recognized that it gave them the opportunity to begin implementing the settlement and move on after a long time. On the other hand, Home Depot refused to make any comments or statements. 

Allegations of Company Conspiracies

Back in 2020, a settlement was reached by Blue Cross Blue Shield and Home Depot after a group of people and businesses who had health insurance through the company noted that the company had conspired with others to suppress competition. 

Blue Cross Blue Shield Logo
Source: Pinterest

The insurance company’s website stated that the Plaintiffs alleged that the Settling Defendants were accused of violating serious antitrust laws by agreeing to not compete with each other and be able to swell health insurance better. 

WATCH: Researchers Find Potential $37 Billion Treasure on $2 Million Coal Mine

- Inline 3 -

Statement on the Website

However, the website went further to clarify that the Settling Defendants strongly deny all the claims and allegations of any wrongdoing. Instead, they claim that their actions simply made it easier for customers to get healthcare by reducing the costs. 

Home Depot Logo
Source: Pinterest

Therefore, both the Plaintiffs and Settling Defendants have reached an agreement for a Settlement in the court of law that would prevent extra expenses and dangers of continuous litigation. 

Denied Petitions 

This was undoubtedly one of the largest class-action settlements in the country’s history. Furthermore, the subscriber’s attorneys requested that the court also deny any petitions by Home Depot. 

Blue Cross Blue Shield Logo
Source: Pinterest

However, the Eleventh Circuit of the United States Court of Appeals also rejected the petition after Home Depot challenged the settlement in October 2023. Unsatisfied with the decision, Home Depot took the case to the U.S. Supreme Court. 

A Significant Change 

According to the settlement, the insurance company will alter its business strategy and also establish a $2.67 billion settlement fund. 

Home Depot store
Source: Pinterest

The website explained further that the Settling Defendants would agree to make changes in the way they do business to increase the business opportunities for the plaintiffs, Home Depot. 

Eligibility and Inclusion Criteria 

Those who had Blue Cross Blue Shield coverage between February 7th, 2008, and October 16th, 2020, may be eligible for this settlement. These include, but are not limited to, individuals, self-funded accounts, and insured groups. 

Legal Agreement
Source: Pinterest

However, there is a slight difference with self-funded accounts. Those who have such accounts have a period from September 1st, 2015, to October 16th, 2020. 

POLL—Should the Government Increase Taxes on the Wealthy To Reduce Economic Inequality?

Exclusion Criteria 

There are some exceptions to this claims and the website has put out the exclusion criteria. These include non-employees, beneficiaries (including minors) and beneficiaries. 

Blue Cross Blue Shield Logo
Source: Pinterest

In addition, the court totally dismissed a hearing of a challenge that asked for a $667 million fee to the class attorneys that worked out the deal on behalf of both of these big companies. 

Some Attorneys Are Pleased

The chairman of Boies, Schiller & Flexner, David Boies, one of the lead class attorneys, also gave a statement regarding the outcome of the case after the long battle. He believes that this verdict was a great result for the health insurance system and the consumers who need it. 

The Law
Source: Pinterest

Therefore, he and his associate attorneys are very pleased with the outcome of the case.

WATCH: Wealthy White Louisiana Residents Split From Black Neighborhoods to Form New City

Varying Figures

One major reason the lawyers’ fees were rejected was that the figure they submitted to the court was much different from what it should have been. 

Money settlement
Source: Pinterest

The court carried out its own analysis and multiplied the hourly rate that they charged by the number of hours that they worked. The court’s calculation showed that it should not be more than $194 million.

Blue Cross Blue Shield Lawyers

The lawyers on the Blue Cross Blue Shield team were the ones who encouraged the judges to turn down both challenges. 

Blue Cross Blue Shield
Source: Pinterest

This is because they believed that the court was making a proper decision and the restriction of future claims by the settlement was highly beneficial. Therefore, Home Depot and its lawyers were disappointed with this outcome but had to abide by the verdict. 

You Might Also Like:

8 Ways to Wear a Scarf This Summer

Top 5 Hair Mask Types We Should All Be Using According to Celebrity Stylists

Critics Mock Right-Wing Commentator Alex Jones as He Cries Over Sandy Hook Legal Bill

5 Outfits to Wear to Your Boat Adventures This Summer

“World Is Over,” 50 Cent Says as Trump Receives Millions From Supporters After Guilty Verdict

- Bottom Ad -
RELATED ARTICLES
- Advertisment -
- Advertisment -

Most Popular