The “utterly insane” comments that Martha-Ann Alito surreptitiously taped have drawn criticism from internet commentators.

Seeing Pride banners in June, the spouse of Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito is heard on tape expressing her desire to answer with a flag bearing the Italian phrase for humiliation or the Sacred Heart of Jesus flag.

Democratic documentary filmmaker Lauren Windsor uploaded the video on X on June 3, shortly after disguising herself as a Christian Republican during an evening affair organized by the Supreme Court Historical Society.

Defenders of Martha-Ann Alito’s freedom to self-expression have supported her by stressing that June is the Sacred Heart of Jesus period as per the Catholic calendar, despite harsh criticism.

The recent uproar surrounding the Alitos has been centered around their raising of an inverted U.S. flag as well as an “Appeal to Heaven” sign, both of which are connected to Donald Trump’s allegations claiming the presidential election for 2020 had been rigged.

Rejecting pleas to disqualify himself from matters concerning the presidential election and the disturbance in the United States Capitol on January 6, 2021, the associate justice claimed that people of common sense did not doubt his capacity to remain unbiased.

Samuel Alito clarified in his letter published on May 29 that he was not involved in the flag’s installation. He said that he was oblivious to the inverted flag until someone pointed it out to him. When he saw it, he requested his spouse remove it; however, she resisted for a few days.

Alito claims that he and his spouse owned their Virginia home together, granting her liberty to utilize it however she pleases. He said there was no additional thing he might have performed to get the national symbol hauled down sooner.

Martha-Ann Alito is heard in the recording expressing her desire for a Sacred Heart of Jesus flag due to having to spend an entire month staring at a Pride flag located adjacent to the bay.

Martha-Ann mentioned her spouse and added that he requested that she not fly a flag, to which she complied, expressing respect for him.

She proceeded to add to the audio, stating that she was going to wave the flag and deliver a daily signal as soon as he was clear of his issue. Perhaps each week, she could switch out the flags, she said.

For her satisfaction, Martha-Ann depicted an emblem she envisioned. She said it has orange and yellow flames surrounding a white body. Also, the Italian word for humiliation, “Vergogna,” is placed in the center. “Vergogna” denotes “shame, shame, shame on you,” she underlined.

Justice Samuel Alito’s wife spoke about striking back with the press on a different section of the tape. She also highlighted her German descent, threatening to take revenge if someone tried to harm her.

Martha-Ann is married to a justice of the highest court. Consequently, Windsor told Rolling Stone that the woman did not qualify as an anonymous individual in his eyes. He feels that the tape offers a peek at his thoughts.

The video has received backlash over the internet. According to journalist Mehdi Hasan, this secret tape of Justice Alito’s flag-waving, vengeful spouse sounded totally insane.

A number of observers agreed with Martha-Ann Alito’s statements. According to an X user @hollykam, one individual can fly a pride flag while another can fly a religious banner.

Thus, the user highlighted that the two are permitted by the right to engage in free expression and added that things aren’t operating as they should.

Windsor also deliberately recorded Samuel Alito inquiring about national cultural variations. Windsor started the conversation by questioning whether it would be possible to negotiate a settlement with the left that would prevent further division. He hinted that the goal could not necessarily be so much to negotiate as to succeed.

The associate justice concurred, indicating that they believed the assertion to be likely true. Without expressing assurance, Samuel Alito said either one party or another could win. Because of his wife’s opinions, the justice’s remarks might have sparked debate on the internet over whether or not Alito can continue to be fair.