The Supreme Court, in a recent decision, denied the appeal of Peter Navarro, a Trump advisor, for evading a House committee’s subpoena on January 6.
Navarro, 74, was liable for two charges of contempt of Congress. The first count was for not appearing before the Capitol attack panel, and the second involved withholding investigation documents.
Navarro’s litigation has captured the public’s interest, given his ties to the Trump administration and the high-profile circumstances surrounding the Capitol breach.
Navarro asked the court for bail pending his four-month sentence, but the plea was denied. He was taken into custody at a Federal Bureau of Prisons satellite camp in Miami intended for older offenders.
ALSO READ: Former Trump Adviser Peter Navarro Surrenders at Federal Prison
As a trade counselor, Navarro claimed he could not assist the House probe because former President Donald Trump was claiming executive privilege concerning the privacy of their conversations.
However, U.S. District Judge Amit Mehta failed to discover any evidence backing up the assertions. Although he could decide against answering certain questions, he still had a mandatory duty to appear before the committee.
Navarro declared in his bail that he was not a threat to public safety or a flight risk. He believed he ought to be released on bail during the appeal filing.
POLL — Should Donald J. Trump Be Allowed to Run for Office?
Besides, in his appeal, he insinuated that the issues he incorporated could overturn his conviction, such as what exactly the “proper” use of executive privilege is.
Despite Navarro’s pleas, Chief Justice John Roberts refused to grant him a bail release from prison while appealing his conviction. Consequently, on March 19, Navarro began his four-month sentence in a federal prison in Miami.
Navarro’s defense based its defense on executive privilege, which protects information between the president and his adviser and cannot be displayed in an open court. However, the court pointed out that Navarro failed to appear even if Trump had ever invoked executive privilege for him.
Navarro attacked the judicial process during his statement, describing it as the partisan weaponization of our judicial system. The same people are in the judiciary, he said, accusing them of being all Democrats.
ALSO READ: Prison Consultant Says Peter Navarro Would “Hear the Lions Roar” If He Goes to Prison
Former White House adviser Steve Bannon faced two contempt charges for defying a committee’s request to appear on January 6. Navarro did not have the same leniency as Bannon, who was released pending appeal and allowed to remain free by a different judge.
Last week, the Supreme Court also refused a request for bail by Navarro, who will likely serve out his four-month jail term and then argue before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit to overturn his conviction. Navarro’s personal and legal struggle remains crucial in the aftermath of the January 6 Capitol uprising.
You Might Also Like:
High School Girl Scouts Member Calls Out School Board for Censoring Her Book Ban Project
Renowned Actress Anne Hathaway Says She’s Now Five Years Sober
Former Secret Service Agent Slams New York Post, Daily Mail With Lawsuits for Defamation
“It Depends,” Trump Not Ruling Out Election Violence If He Loses to Biden in November
Riley Gaines Blasts Lia Thomas for His “Utter Disregard” in Women’s Sports
