Thursday, May 16, 2024
- Advertisment -
HomeNewsConservative Group Slams San Francisco With Lawsuit Over It's Guaranteed Income Program 

Conservative Group Slams San Francisco With Lawsuit Over It’s Guaranteed Income Program 

- Top Ad -

The GIFT program would have gone under the radar without the public knowing of its existence. However, it was exposed by a conservative group, which also revealed some time ago that a dog belonging to President Biden repeatedly bites Secret Service personnel attached to the White House. 

Mayor Breed addressing an audience at the launch of the GIFT program
Source: Hum Image/Alamy

The advocacy group has since filed a lawsuit against the City of San Francisco to challenge the legitimacy of the GIFT program under US laws. 

Standing in the Gap for Taxpayers  

The advocacy group’s name is Judicial Watch, and they filed the lawsuit against San Francisco administrators in January. Some of the officials indicted in the illegitimacy of the guaranteed income program are City Administrator Carmen Chu, Treasurer José Cisneros, and Mayor London Breed. Chu doubles as the executive director of San Fransisco’s Office of Transgender Initiatives.    

- Inline 1-
Breed and some members of the LGBTQ+ community
Source: London Breed/X

The lawsuit document also lists Paul Wildes, Michael Phillips, and Reed Sandberg as plaintiffs, representing San Francisco taxpayers. 

ALSO READ: Missouri City Declares Itself a Safe Haven for LGBTQ+ Community

Giving Millions of Taxpayer Money to the LGBTQ Community?  

According to findings made by Judicial Watch, the GIFT program was paying a non-refundable stipend of $1200 to 55 low-income transgender people. This amounts to a total of $66,000 per month. 

A public health personnel interacting with an internally displaced person
Source: SF_DPH/X

In addition, the cash transfer scheme was slated to run from January 2023 till June 2024. This timeline will bring the total money of taxpayers to be spent on the GIFT program to $1.188 million. 

- Inline 2-

How to Benefit From the GIFT Payout 

The GIFT program picks beneficiaries using a financial metric. Of course, besides being a trans person, the individual would have to earn less than $600 per month. 

Homeless people receiving health care right on the street
Source: SF_DPH/X

Judicial Watch’s bone of contention is the fact that trans people are disproportionately favored relative to other residents of San Francisco. The question that begs for an answer is: “Does a low-income earner in San Francisco have to undergo a gender transition before they can enjoy the social benefits of the city?” 

Judicial Watch and the Fight-Hard Habit  

Interestingly, this would not be Judicial Watch’s first lawsuit against a diversity policy. In 2022, the group challenged a California law that requires ethnic, racial, and sexual diversity on corporate boards. 

Tom Fitton mobilizing patrons of Judicial Watch during a fundraiser
Source: Judicial Watch/Facebook

 In the 2022 lawsuit against the state of California, Judicial Watch affirmed that the diversity directive was illegal and imposes a quota system on corporate organizations. The judge hearing the case upheld the affirmations and called for a repealing of the contentious law. 

- Inline 3 -

POLL — Should Public Schools Include Critical Race Theory and Sex Education in Their Curriculum?

Colored Trans People are not Trans?  

In the last week of January, Judicial Watch announced the filing of its GIFT lawsuit against the City of San Francisco. 

A group of coloured residents of San Francisco
Source: Museum of the African Diaspora/X

 The lawsuit points out that the GIFT program does not only marginalize binary residents of San Francisco but equally denies Latino and Black trans residents from benefiting from the guaranteed cash transfer. 

How to Run a Pro-Trans City  

So, though it is not in the books, being trans and poor is not enough to be a GIFT beneficiary; the additional requirement is to be a Caucasian. 

Mayor Breed addressing an audience
Source: Pax Ahimsa Gethen/X

In a statement by Tom Fitton, president of Judicial Watch, he said, “The transgender extremists running San Francisco are illegally using taxpayer money to hand out free cash to transgender individuals based on race and sex in blatant violation of the state’s constitution.” 

The GIFT Conveners Go Silent    

Since the lawsuit was filed against the GIFT program as an initiative by the City of San Francisco, the City’s attorney general will be the official to respond to the official prompt. 

Chesa Boudin speaking in the capacity of San Francisco DA
Source: KTVU Fox 2 San Francisco /YouTube

So far, the indicted parties have refused to make any statement about the unconstitutional misdeeds being perpetrated under the GIFT program. So far, the only feedback from the defendants is from the City’s attorney general.    

ALSO READ: “The UN Can Go Pound Sand!” Abbott Rails Against Criticisms of New Anti-LGBTQ State Laws

Trans Medicare Gives Way Trans Welfare 

The GIFT program is an initiative of City officials and Lyon-Martin Community Health Services. Lyon-Martin has a reputation for providing gender-transitioning treatments for non-binary residents of San Francisco. 

Two graduates at their award ceremony
Source: London Breed/X

The LGBTQ+ community sees the GIFT program as a mini-reparation. According to JM Jaffe, executive director of Lyon Martin, the GIFT program should have started long before its commencement in 2022. 

You Might Also Like:

Kanye West Tells Kim Kardashian to Take Their Kids Out of Their School

Police Confirm 4 Dead, 3 Injured in California House Party Shooting

Pentagon Leak Defendant Jack Teixeira Faces Years in Prison After Pleading Guilty

“You Hate Americans!” Critics Slam President Biden Over His Handling of Migrant Crisis

California’s Economic Struggles Under Gavin Newsom Sends a Warning to the Rest of the Country

- Bottom Ad -
RELATED ARTICLES
- Advertisment -
- Advertisment -

Most Popular